Investigation on the Influence of Duobinary and CSRZ Modulation Formats on Self Phase Modulation Effect in Optical Communication Network

S. Selvendran¹ , A. Sivanantharaja² , K. Esakkimuthu³

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Isroset-Journal
Vol.6 , Issue.4 , pp.17-22, Aug-2018

CrossRef-DOI:   https://doi.org/10.26438/ijsrpas/v6i4.1722

Online published on Aug 31, 2018

Copyright © S. Selvendran, A. Sivanantharaja, K. Esakkimuthu . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

530 Views    279 Downloads    180 Downloads

Abstract :
Optical communication is a prominent technology for future communication sector because of its low power consumption, high capacity and lower attenuation. It is also affected by the detrimental effects of optical fiber such as dispersion and nonlinear effects. In this paper, the impact of Carrier Suppressed Return to Zero (CSRZ) and Duobinary modulation formats on unfavorable nonlinear Self phase modulation effect of fibers has been analyzed. Modulation formats can have also significant influence on nonlinear effect due to its spectral characteristics. The performance characteristics of this system such as BER and Q-factor are measured with the help of optisystem software. Duobinary gives Q-factor of about 5.57276 and BER of 9.68E-09 even in the case of 40 Gbps bit rate and power 20dBm, whereas CSRZ has the Q-factor of 4.12739 and BER of 1.46E-05 respectively.

Key-Words / Index Term :
Fiber Nonlinearity, Self-Phase Modulation, Modulation format, Quality (Q) Factor, Bit error rate

References :
[1]. V. Bobrovs, J. Porins, G. Ivanovs. Influence of Nonlinear Optical Effects on the NRZ and RZ Modulation Signals in WDM Systems // Electronics and Electrical Engineering. – Kaunas: Technologija, 2007. – No. 4(76). – P. 55–58..
[2]. Virendra kumar, A.K.Jaiswal, Mukesh kumar, Nilesh agrawal, Rohini Saxena, “Design and Performance Analysis of Optical Transmission system” IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN), ISSN (e): 2250-3021, ISSN (p): 2278-8719Vol. 04, Issue 05 (May. 2014), ||V3|| PP 22-26
[3]. Varun Marwaha, Ankur Singhal, Satinder Pal Ahuja, “Performance Evaluation of Modulation Format for Optical System” International organization of Scientific Research (IJECT), Vol. 3, Issue 1, Jan. - March 2012.
[4]. S. P. Singh and N. Singh “Nonlinear Effects In Optical Fibers: Origin, Management And Applications” Progress In Electromagnetics Research, PIER 73, 249–275, 2007.
[5]. Narender Kumar Sihval and Amit Kumar Garg “Simulation and Analysis of Self Phase Modulation Fiber Non Linearity” Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology (JMEST), ISSN: 3159-0040, Vol. 2 Issue 6, June - 2015.
[6]. Stella M. Foaleng. et al., “Detrimental effect of self-phase modulation on the performance of Brillouin Distributed fiber sensors” Optical letters, vol. 36, Issue 2, PP. 97-9.
[7]. 7. Akira Suda and Takanori Takeda “Effects of Nonlinear Chirp on the Self-Phase Modulation of Ultra short Optical Pulse” Appl. Sci., Vol. 2, Issue 2, PP.549-557; doi:10.3390/app2020549.
[8]. T.Wuth, W.Kaiser and W.rosenkranz “Impact of Self-Phase Modulation on Bandwidth Efficient Modulation Formats” Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibit, 2001. OFC 2001, DOI: 10.1109/OFC.2001.927923.