Validation of Five Dimensional Personality Inventory among Nursing Professionals

Z. Hamid¹ , S. Shah²

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Isroset-Journal
Vol.4 , Issue.12 , pp.49-53, Dec-2018

CrossRef-DOI:   https://doi.org/10.26438/ijsrms/v4i12.4953

Online published on Dec 31, 2018

Copyright © Z. Hamid, S. Shah . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

XML View     PDF Download

How to Cite this Paper

264 Views    196 Downloads    87 Downloads

Abstract :
Assessment of personality depends not only on the adherence to sound theoretical background but also on the way this construct is operationalized. Besides, application of proper psychometric procedures is also of tremendous importance for proper validation of personality tools, in this context this study aimed to validate an indigenously developed personality tool among a specific population of nurses. The sample comprised of 300 nurses selected from 11 different hospitals/nursing homes and a standardized tool was adopted to get their responses on a seven point Likert scale. This was followed by analysis of data, descriptive analysis revealed that majority of respondents fall in average category on various dimensions of personality traits. The reliability of the adopted tool was almost found to be satisfactory as indicated by the Cronbach’s alpha value beyond the threshold of 0.60 .While carrying out the confirmatory factor analysis it was found that the model fit indices of the adopted personality inventory are within the acceptable ranges.The paper contributes to theory by checking the psychometric properties of a personality tool assessing big five dimensions of personality, pertinently big five measures are increasingly getting psychometric attention in contemporary times.

Key-Words / Index Term :
Psychometric, Likert, Tool, Nursing, Personality

References :
[1.] Muzamil, M., & Shawkat, S., Five dimensional personality inventory. Phd Thesis. Department of Psychology, University of Kashmir, 2015.
[2] Norman, W.T , Towards an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 66, pp. 574-583, 1963.
[3].Goldberg, L. R., An alternative description of personality: the big-five factor structure. Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol.59, Issue.6, pp. 12-16, 1990.
[4] Goldberg, L.R., The development of markers for the Big –Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, Vol. 4, pp.26-42, 1992.
[5] Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R., Professional manual: revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI).Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Vol. 61. 1992.
[6] Costa,P.T., & McCrae,R.R., Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 64, pp. 21-50, 1995.
[7] John, O. P., & Srivastava, S., The Big – Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L.A. Pervin & O.P.John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research, New York: Guilford Press.Vol.2, pp.102-138, 1999.
[8].Atkins, J., & Piazza, D. , Personality types of emergency nurses, Journal of Emergency Nursing, Vol. 13, pp. 33-37, 1987.
[9] Bean, C. A., & Holcombe, J. K. , Personality types of oncology nurses. Cancer Nursing, Vol. 16, Issue.6, pp. 479-485, 1993.
[10] Lewis, S. L., Bonner, P. N., Campbell, M. A., Cooper, C. L., & Willard, A. Personality, stress, coping, and sense of coherence among nephrology nurses in dialysis settings. ANNA journal/American Nephrology Nurses` Association, Vol.21, Issue.6, pp. 325-35, 1994.
[11] Burgess, L., Irvine, F., & Wallymahmed, A., Personality, stress and coping in intensive care nurses: a descriptive exploratory study, Nursing in critical care, Vol. 15, Issue.3, pp. 129-140, 2010.